Social networks are featured in magazines and newspapers nowadays. Their founders have made millions and their products are used by many millions. You know all this.
You probably also know that there are thousands more social networks out there. Via ning.com you can even create your own without any effort whasoever. And if you google for whitelabel social network you get dozens of results. Insoshi or phpizabi are but two of the freely downloadable ones you can install on your own server. In short, you can create your own social network if you want to, there is little or nothing stopping you. You can do it free, and only a few hundred bucks are needed to give you tons of extra features and ultimate control.
This is why you should not start your own general social network.
Sure, you can do it. But you might end up with a social network that has 1000 users, needs a server to keep it going and can’t get any other ads than Google adsense. In fact, if you reach this after one year, you may consider yourself one of the better ones. The reason for this is very simple.
Everyone can start a social network nowadays. Some will be more posh than others, most will just use a whitelabel or free solution, but they all forget a simple economic law.
Supply and demand always try to reach equilibrium.
Today supply is huge, demand is saturated. At least for general social networks. Anyone starting a new general social network now will have to offer something spectacularly different, i.e. offer a new supply that will create a new demand and fill the gaps in demand that used to be there.
Thus supply is vast, and most of it is mediocre. You would need to be better than the kings of the game to draw in the early adopters, as you would need to do to start growing. The mediocre ones are not going to make it big. Even the ones clearly better or more feature packed will have immense trouble to stay afloat.
You find the value of any social media project in the people using it. Half a billion people are on Myspace. Myspace is owned by News Corp and has huuuge wads of cash. The typical way to make money of these kinds of projects are ads, thus revenue is determined by the number of people using it a lot.
A new social network would have to be different, and appeal to the user as being “better”. It would also need to have a foolproof way of making money, preferably without ads as the main pillar.
There are plenty of social networks that manage this. They all have one thing in common: they focus on a niche. Niche is the holy word for every new social network.
Niches can be divided in
* the target audience
* the specific theme of the social network
* the method and infrastructure of the social network
For instance, Asmallworld.com differentiates itself by being highly exclusive. You cannot join them just like that. You have to be invited by someone with invitation privileges, and few people actually have this. The result is that they are very, very exclusive and this makes being on the network a social statement. You wear Prada, you drive a Murcielago, you are friends with celebrities, and you have a page on Asmallworld.com. Exclusivity sells. Ads on that site are seen by the rich and famous, the jetset of the world. (I am not a member of Asmallworld.com)
LinkedIn has a specific theme. They are the professionals network, aimed mostly at higher educated, at least middle management kinda people. That is why it is being used more and more as a recruitment pool or a business advice/contact network. (I am on LinkedIn)
The method and infrastructure is another beauty. Who says you need to work the standard way? Isn’t Twitter a social network with the possibilities to add and follow friends, block people, share your life, keep in touch? Mobile social networks like Zingku (now owned by Google) are popping up… It doesn’t need to be a page with a photo and your hobbies anymore.
So. If you want to start in social networking, that will be like starting in hosting. You enter a world of absolute competition, where everyone is a potential customer and there is almost no way of binding your customers to you. You will need to be different. You will need to add value. You will need to find a niche that holds enough people to have a userbase large enough to be profitable, a way of monetizing this and the infrastructure to make it happen.
That means you need people to join it, a niche that will both attract people and keep them active, money to be made from this, and either a white label hosted or a self written and self hosted social network.
And don’t forget people don’t have unlimited time and attention. People may join a few networks. But they won’t join an unlimited number. And even those who join lots will not be as active on each and every one.
The solution to that of course is community building, integration with popular services (like photobucket or imdb.com for isntance), and constantly improving your social network. And even then, it is unsure if you will be profitable.
The gold rush started after some people found gold. But by the time the gold rush had begun, the easy treasure had been found and claimed, with newcomers depending on luck and some expertise to find anything. Quite a few people spent the rest of their days digging trough dust on a small scrap of land, hoping to find the motherload.
And now to conclude: some fun stuff! I have created a social network, just for you! Readers of Lex Aeterna can join at: http://lexaeterna.ning.com/